[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1163967590.5826.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:19:50 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwalker@...sta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: PowerPC: fix breakage in threaded fasteoi
type IRQ handlers
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 21:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > Wait wait wait .... Can somebody (Ingo ?) explain me why the fasteoi
> > handler is being changed and what is the rationale for adding an ack
> > that was not necessary before ?
>
> dont worry, it's -rt only stuff.
Still, I'm curious :-) Besides, there have been people talking about
having -rt work on ppc64 so ...
What do you need an ack() for on fasteoi ? On all fasteoi controllers I
have, ack is implicit by obtaining the vector number and all there is is
an eoi...
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists