[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1163968885.5826.116.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:41:25 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwalker@...sta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: PowerPC: fix breakage in threaded fasteoi
type IRQ handlers
> This is not implicit -- CPU has to read INTACK reg. on OpenPIC.
Which is what I meant... "implicit by reading the vector".
> Really implicit method is in action on x86 where CPU issues dual ACK bus cycle to get
> the vector form 8259...
Which you can do on OpenPIC too. It's the same idea. The concept that
obtaining the vector performs the ack.
> > EOI is a more "high level" thing that some "intelligent" PICs that
> > automatically raise the priority do to restore the priority to what it
> > was before the interrupt occured.
>
> Thank you, I know. Even 8259 has the notion of priority and EOI works the
> same way here.
Ok, so why would you need an ack there then while eoi is just what you
need ? :-)
Also, that's interesting what you are saying about 8259... I should be
able to convert ppc's i8259 to use fasteoi too...
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists