[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611192225.52074.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:25:51 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
On Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > because people point to the suspend-to-disk instead.
> >
> > Who they?
>
> Like you _just_ did.
No, I didn't. It was referred to in the message that started this thread.
I don't remeber telling _anyone_ not to use the STR and use the STD instead.
> > > - enable PM_DEBUG, and PM_TRACE
> >
> > This only works on i386, no?
>
> Right now the trivial functions are only available on i386, yes. The
> concept works anywhere that has a CMOS chip, so if somebody were to spend
> a few minutes testing it on x86-64 and others, it would work elsewhere
> too..
I can do that if someone gives me the code.
> > I don't know of anyone who's doing that.
>
> I know. I'm probably the only one. Frustrating.
Well, it isn't that well documented ...
Greetings,
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists