linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] mark pci_find_device() as _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061119152421.GB19613@rhun.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:24:21 +0200
From:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] mark pci_find_device() as __deprecated

On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 03:06:00PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> unmaintained != not used
> 
> As an example, some people might be unhappy if the floppy driver that is 
> unmaintained for ages and not in a good state was removed.

I understand. However, if it was slated to be removed, said people
might be inclined to start maintaining it. We have a bar for inclusion
of new code into the tree - why shouldn't a quality bar also be
applied to old code in the tree?

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/