linux-kernel - Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611190930370.3692@woody.osdl.org>
Date:	Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:33:37 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on 
 SOFTWARE_SUSPEND



On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
> When doing 'make oldconfig' we should ask about suspend/resume
> debug features when SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is not enabled.

That's wrong.

I never use SOFTWARE_SUSPEND, and I think the whole concept is totally 
broken.

Sane people use suspend-to-ram, and that's when you need the suspend and 
resume debugging.

Software-suspend is silly. I want my machine back in three seconds, not 
waiting for minutes..

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/