lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1163958288.22176.82.camel@mindpipe>
Date:	Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:44:47 -0500
From:	Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	Christian <christiand59@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sluggish system responsiveness on I/O

On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 08:51 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> That makes sense, I/O tasks don't generally hold the cpu for extended
> periods, whereas a cpu bound task does.

So what can we do about I/O intensive tasks that also want a lot of CPU,
for example, the bloatier Gnome/KDE apps?  Evolution is the worst for
me.

Lee  

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ