[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <455FC9E2.3080504@tmr.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:05:06 -0500
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
discuss@...-64.org, William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
Komuro <komurojun-mbn@...ty.com>,
Ernst Herzberg <earny@...4u.de>,
Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>,
oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, phil.el@...adoo.fr,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Alex Romosan <romosan@...orax.lbl.gov>, gregkh@...e.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions (v3)
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:59:07 +0100
> Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> wrote:
>
>> Andrew Morton writes:
>> > On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:55:46 +0100
>> > Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Andrew Morton writes:
>> > > > Surely the appropriate behaviour is to allow oprofile to steal the NMI and
>> > > > to then put the NMI back to doing the watchdog thing after oprofile has
>> > > > finished with it.
>> > >
>> > > Which is _exactly_ what pre-2.6.19-rc1 kernels did. I implemented
>> > > the in-kernel API allowing real performance counter drivers like
>> > > oprofile (and perfctr) to claim the HW from the NMI watchdog,
>> > > do their work, and then release it which resumed the watchdog.
>> >
>> > OK. But from Andi's comments it seems that the NMI watchdog was failing to
>> > resume its operation.
>>
>> It certainly worked when I originally implemented it. If it didn't work
>> that way before 2.6.19-rc1 butchered it then that would have been a bug
>> that should have been fixed.
>
> Oh. OK.
>
> Meanwhile, 2.6.19-rc6 remains unfixed.
>
Has anyone verified that nmi watchdog works at all in 2.6.19-rc6? I
haven't built a kernel since rc2, other things have been taking my time.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Obscure bug of 2004: BASH BUFFER OVERFLOW - if bash is being run by a
normal user and is setuid root, with the "vi" line edit mode selected,
and the character set is "big5," an off-by-one errors occurs during
wildcard (glob) expansion.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists