[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611191958.15152.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:58:14 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
On Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:52, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 09:33 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > >
> > > When doing 'make oldconfig' we should ask about suspend/resume
> > > debug features when SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is not enabled.
> >
> > That's wrong.
> >
> > I never use SOFTWARE_SUSPEND, and I think the whole concept is totally
> > broken.
> >
> > Sane people use suspend-to-ram, and that's when you need the suspend and
> > resume debugging.
>
> Here I am wishing I had the _opportunity_ to be sane. With my ATI X850
> AGP card, I have no choices except swsusp or reboot.
Have you tried s2ram (http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram)?
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists