[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061120114248.60bb0869@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:42:48 +0000
From: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stefan Roese <ml@...fan-roese.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-embedded@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Use real irq on UART0 (IRQ = 0) on PPC4xx
systems
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:00:36 +0100
Stefan Roese <ml@...fan-roese.de> wrote:
> This patch fixes a problem seen on multiple 4xx platforms, where
> the UART0 interrupt number is 0. The macro "is_real_interrupt" lead
> on those systems to not use an real interrupt but the timer based
> implementation.
NAK.
Zero means "no interrupt" in the Linux space. If you have a physical IRQ
0 remap it to a convenient number (eg map IRQ's + 1, or stick it on the
end). The logical and physical IRQ numbering in Linux don't have to match
up - and given some platforms have IRQ numbering per bus and the like
clearly doesn't in many cases.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists