[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611210003.13417.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:03:12 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...uxmail.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: Quadratic behavior of shrink_dcache_parent()
On Monday, 20 November 2006 12:10, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> The shrink_dcache_parent() can take a very long time for deep
> directory trees: minutes for depth of 100,000, probably hours for
> depth of 1,000,000.
>
> The reason is that after dropping a leaf, it starts again from the
> root.
Oh, well. So that's the reason why the shrinking of memory in swsusp can
take so much time.
> Filesystems affected include FUSE, NFS, CIFS. Others I haven't
> checked. NFS and to a lesser extent CIFS don't seem to efficiently
> handle lookups within such a deep hierarchy, so they're sort of
> immune.
>
> But with FUSE it's pretty easy to DoS the system.
>
> Limiting the depth to some sane value could work around this problem,
> but that would mean having to traverse subtrees in rename().
>
> Any better ideas?
None, for now. It looks like I need to learn that code ...
Greetings,
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists