lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:13:14 +0200
From:	Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re[2]: Where did find_bus() go in 2.6.18?

Hello Jiri,

Monday, November 20, 2006, 1:45:51 AM, you wrote:

> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>>   But alas, the commit message is not as good as some others are, and
>> doesn't mention what should be used instead. So, if find_bus() is
>> "unused", what should be used instead?

> You should probably mention what for?

  Indeed, I'm sorry! Looking at find_bus()'s docstring:

/**
 *      find_bus - locate bus by name.
 *      @name:  name of bus.

 So well, I'd like to know exactly that - what function should be
used instead of find_bus() to locate bus by name.


> regards,



-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                            mailto:pmiscml@...il.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ