[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061120105735.GA9795@APFDCB5C>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:57:35 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: Don Mullis <dwm@...r.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de, akpm <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] fault-injection: reject-failure-if-any-caller-lies-within-specified range
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 07:04:07PM -0800, Don Mullis wrote:
> /debug/fail_make_request can force a failure like the following:
>
> FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure
...
> Buffer I/O error on device hda2, logical block 5782
> lost page write due to I/O error on hda2
> Aborting journal on device hda2.
> journal commit I/O error
> ext3_abort called.
> EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal
> Remounting filesystem read-only
>
> The above read-only remount effectively ends the test run.
This test is a little intentional.
(Normal I/O may fail, but journal commit I/O doesn't fail)
If you want to do this, you could put journal on the other device.
> Implementation approach is to extend the existing
> address-start/address-end mechanism specifying a range _required_ to
> be found on the stack, by the addition of an address range to be
> _rejected_.
The only problem about this is, the users who set reject address range really
don't want to insert failures from the address range. So they have to change
stacktrace-depth large enough. It will cause large slow down by aggressive
stacktrace and there is no guarantee to prevent from injecting failures the
address range.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists