linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]: first proposal for pci resume quirk interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45631455.9000805@gmx.net>
Date:	Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:59:33 +0100
From:	Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@....net>
To:	Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: first proposal for pci resume quirk interface

Alan wrote:
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/arch/i386/pci/fixup.c	2006-11-10 10:38:25.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/arch/i386/pci/fixup.c	2006-11-14 15:13:03.000000000 +0000
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
>  #define VIA_8363_KL133_REVISION_ID 0x81
>  #define VIA_8363_KM133_REVISION_ID 0x84
>  
> -static void __devinit pci_fixup_via_northbridge_bug(struct pci_dev *d)
> +static void pci_fixup_via_northbridge_bug(struct pci_dev *d)
>  {
>  	u8 v;
>  	u8 revision;

I sent a similar patch about one year ago and it was rejected back then.
Any reasons why fixups on resume suddenly are desirable?
(I agree with the patch wholehartedly and will test it ASAP on my
Samsung P35 laptop which needs the asus_hides_smbus quirk.)

Regards,
Carl-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/