linux-kernel - Re: LTTng do_page_fault vs handle_mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4563289A.2000702@ru.mvista.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:26:02 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ltt-dev@...fik.org, mgreer@...sta.com, mlachwani@...sta.com
Subject: Re: LTTng do_page_fault vs handle_mm_fault instrumentation

Hello.

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> I would like to discuss your suggestion of moving the do_page_fault
> instrumentation to handle_mm_fault. On one side, it helps removing architecture
> dependant instrumentation, but on the other hand :

> 1- We cannot access the struct pt_regs in all cases (there may be an invalid
>    current task struct).
> 2- We cannot distinguish between calls to handle_mm_fault from the page fault
>    handler or from get_user_pages.
> 3- Some people complain about not having enough information about the cause of
>    the page fault (see the forward below).
> 
> So instead of staying between my users who ask for those feature and kernel
> developers who wish to reduce the intrusiveness of instrumentation (which is a
> nice goal : moving the syscall entry/exit instrumentation do do_syscall_trace
> has helped simplifying the instrumentation), I prefer to open the discussion
> about it.

    It seems I've missed the whole story behind this move.
    For me, it was more a question of consistency: if we're trying to trace 
all trap handlers, why not page fault one? So, I just wanted my old LTT 
tracepoints back. :-)

> Ideas/comments are welcome.

> Regards,

> Mathieu

WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/