[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061121085535.9c62b54f.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:55:35 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Christian Krafft <krafft@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] fix call to alloc_bootmem after bootmem has been
freed
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:32:38 +0100
Christian Krafft <krafft@...ibm.com> wrote:
> In some cases it might happen, that alloc_bootmem is beeing called
> after bootmem pages have been freed. This is, because the condition
> SYSTEM_BOOTING is still true after bootmem has been freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Krafft <krafft@...ibm.com>
>
> Index: linux/mm/page_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1931,7 +1931,7 @@ int zone_wait_table_init(struct zone *zo
> alloc_size = zone->wait_table_hash_nr_entries
> * sizeof(wait_queue_head_t);
>
> - if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
> + if (!slab_is_available()) {
> zone->wait_table = (wait_queue_head_t *)
> alloc_bootmem_node(pgdat, alloc_size);
> } else {
I don't think that slab_is_available() is an appropriate way of working out
if we can call vmalloc().
Also, a more complete description of the problem is needed, please. Which
caller is incorrectly allocating bootmem?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists