linux-kernel - Re: [-mm patch] make net/core/skbuff.c:skb_over

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061120173716.10357a90.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:37:16 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	bunk@...sta.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] make net/core/skbuff.c:skb_over_panic() static

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:55:56 -0500 (EST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:02:05 +0100
> 
> > skb_over_panic() can now become static.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> 
> Applied to net-2.6.20, thanks Adrian.

Adrian's patch is only applicable if my net-uninline-skb_put.patch is also
applied.

I'm not sure what to do with net-uninline-skb_put.patch.  It's a good patch
if all that deudgging stuff is present in skb_put(), but it's a bad patch
if it isn't present.  But it _is_ present.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/