[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061121022109.GF1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:21:09 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>, torvalds@...l.org,
akpm@...l.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Metathronius Galabant <m.galabant@...glemail.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 46/61] fix Intel RNG detection
* Dave Jones (davej@...hat.com) wrote:
> Since I pushed an update to our Fedora users based on 2.6.18.2, a few people
> have reported they no longer have their RNG's detected.
> Here's one report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215144
Hmm, I wonder if the report is valid? Jan's patch would have the correct
side effect of disabling false positives (for RNG identification).
Be good to check that it actually used to work.
Having said that, Jan the datasheet recommendation is looser than your
implementation. It only recommends checking for manufacturer code,
you check device code as well. Do you know of any scenarios where that
would matter (I can't conceive of any)?
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists