[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061121215645.GD9651@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:56:45 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it>, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:39:00PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 04:31:39PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:24:24PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > > Subject : CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y compile error
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/17/198
> > > Submitter : alex1000@...cast.net
> > > Caused-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey_y_starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>
> > > commit 05ca0350e8caa91a5ec9961c585c98005b6934ea
> > > Handled-By : Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it>
> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/17/236
> > > Status : patch available
> >
> > not a regression, easily worked around, queued for .20
>
> It is a regression since commit 05ca0350e8caa91a5ec9961c585c98005b6934ea
> was merged after 2.6.18.
Ah, I misinterpreted when that cset went in (I read the commit date
which was back in June, not the merge date, which was september).
> Considering that the fix is trivial, why shouldn't it be merged before
> 2.6.19?
Yes, I'll push it on.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists