linux-kernel - Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45626AC1.4030308@billgatliff.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:56:01 -0600
From:	Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
CC:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>, jamey.hicks@...com,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls

David Brownell wrote:

>I could certainly take all that feedback and let it lead me to some particular
>implementation -- example, a table of { controller, index, flags } structs indexed
>by the GPIO numbers, with controller ops vectors matching the primitives -- but
>even if that were to happen, I'd like to know if anyone has any major disagreement
>with the summary above.
>  
>


Your summary agrees with me.


b.g.

-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@...lgatliff.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/