[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061120163432.4824ffe7.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:34:32 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] WorkStruct: Merge the pending bit into the wq_data
pointer
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:27:20 +0000 David Howells wrote:
> Reclaim a word from the size of the work_struct by folding the pending bit and
> the wq_data pointer together. This shouldn't cause misalignment problems as
> all pointers should be at least 4-byte aligned.
>
> Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/block/floppy.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/workqueue.h | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> kernel/workqueue.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> index 0d5bbd4..67e6a7f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> @@ -14,11 +14,15 @@ struct workqueue_struct;
> typedef void (*work_func_t)(void *data);
>
> struct work_struct {
> - unsigned long pending;
> + /* the first word is the work queue pointer and the pending flag
> + * rolled into one */
> + unsigned long management;
> +#define WORK_STRUCT_PENDING 0 /* T if work item pending execution */
Does 'T' mean true? I think Linus's comment applies here also.
> +#define WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK (3UL)
> +#define WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK (~WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK)
> struct list_head entry;
> work_func_t func;
> void *data;
> - void *wq_data;
> };
>
> struct dwork_struct {
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists