[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061122121516.GA7229@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:15:16 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
Johann Borck <johann.borck@...sedata.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Alexander Viro <aviro@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [take24 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:09:34PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@....mipt.ru) wrote:
> Ok, to solve the problem in the way which should be good for both I
> decided to implement additional syscall which will allow to mark any
> event as ready and thus wake up appropriate threads. If userspace will
> request zero events to be marked as ready, syscall will just
> interrupt/wakeup one of the listeners parked in syscall.
Btw, what about putting aditional multiplexer into add/remove/modify
switch? There will be logical 'ready' addon?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists