[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4564566F.7030202@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:53:51 +0100
From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
To: Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org>
CC: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
Hello,
Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> This patch looks acceptable for us.
good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below.
> BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a
> reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent
> patchset over his interface.
yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's more in
the spirit of uts and ipc namespace (and user namespace if that reaches the
kernel one day :) so that's why i made the small changes.
It also helping the nsproxy/namespace syscalls to have a similar interface
to manipulate namespaces. who knows, soon we might be able to have a 'struct
namespace' with a ops field to define new namespace types ?
I can also send a empty framework for user namespace ;)
thanks for reacting !
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists