[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45648190.20000@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:57:52 +0100
From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
CC: Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework
> Where is Andrey's patch?
The last I saw was on 2.6.18-rc4-mm1 :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115572448503723&w=2
>> the spirit of uts and ipc namespace (and user namespace if that reaches the
>> kernel one day :) so that's why i made the small changes.
>
> I agree the namespace frameworks should be consistent, but i don't know
> whether Andrey's is or not. I'd like to have the framework included so
> we reduce the number of silly rewrites due to clone flag collisions etc.
yes. it is a pain to maintain.
>> It also helping the nsproxy/namespace syscalls to have a similar interface
>> to manipulate namespaces. who knows, soon we might be able to have a 'struct
>> namespace' with a ops field to define new namespace types ?
>>
>> I can also send a empty framework for user namespace ;)
>
> Please do - then I'll rebase the patchset I sent to the containes list
> onto your patch, and resubmit the whole userns.
I'll send a refreshed version of both in the next round.
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists