linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] X86_genericarch needs SMP?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200611221850.11965.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:50:11 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86_genericarch needs SMP?

On Wednesday 22 November 2006 18:48, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> 
> With
> CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH=y
> (and CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT=n), kernel build gets:
> 
> arch/i386/mach-generic/built-in.o: In function `apicid_to_node':
> summit.c:(.text+0x54): undefined reference to `apicid_2_node'
> 
> so should X86_GENERICARCH depend on SMP?
> or should there be more ifdefs in the source files?

I already fixed that here in a different way, but the patch didn't make 
it to Linus yet.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/