linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19-rc6 : Spontaneous reboots, stack overflows - seems to implicate xfs, scsi, networking, SMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061122120119.416901c7@freekitty>
Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:01:19 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc:	"David Chinner" <dgc@....com>, chatz@...bourne.sgi.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	xfs-masters@....sgi.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6 : Spontaneous reboots, stack overflows - seems to
 implicate xfs, scsi, networking, SMP

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:58:11 +0100
"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com> wrote:

> On 22/11/06, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> wrote:
> > On 22/11/06, David Chinner <dgc@....com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:02:23PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > On 21/11/06, David Chatterton <chatz@...bourne.sgi.com> wrote:
> ...
> > > > >Thanks for traces, I've captured this information.
> > > > >
> > > > You are welcome. If you want/need more traces then I've got ~2.1G
> > > > worth of traces that you can have :)
> > >
> > > Well, we don't need that many, but it would be nice to have a
> > > set of unique traces that lead to overflows - could you process
> > > them in some way just to extract just the unique XFS traces that
> > > occur?
> > >
> > I'll try to extract a copy of each unique trace that involves xfs,
> > sometime tomorrow or the day after, and then send you the result.
> >
> 
> Attached are two files. The one named stack_overflows.txt.gz contains
> one instance of each unique stack overflow + trace that I've got.  The
> other file named kernel_BUG.txt.gz contains a few BUG() messages that
> were also in the logs.
> 

You have a kind of worst case scenario there:
	XFS + Block layer
	TCP receive/transmit
	VLAN

It is hard to know who to blame, there is no information about stack
level at each call. Since it doesn't show up for filesystems other than
XFS, I would pick on that. Perhaps the following:


--- 2.6.19-rc6.orig/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug	2006-11-22 11:59:32.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.19-rc6/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug	2006-11-22 12:00:28.000000000 -0800
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
 
 config 4KSTACKS
 	bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb"
-	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
+	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && !XFS_FS
 	help
 	  If you say Y here the kernel will use a 4Kb stacksize for the
 	  kernel stack attached to each process/thread. This facilitates
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/