linux-kernel - Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200611221121.59322.dim@openvz.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:21:58 +0300
From:	Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>, Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework

On Tuesday 21 November 2006 21:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > Cedric,
> >
> > Dmitry Mishin and Daniel Lezcano are working together on the full
> > network namespace incorporating both needs of OpenVZ and VServer/IBM.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kirill
>
> Kirill,
>
> We will need this framework to move the network isolation code to the
> ns_proxy/net_namespace structure. So if Cedric gives us a empty
> framework it is fine, except if someone does not agree with it...
>
>    -- Daniel.
This patch looks acceptable for us.
BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a 
reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent 
patchset over his interface.

-- 
Thanks,
Dmitry.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/