linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OFCFF36ACF.6FF07D9E-ONC125722F.00499C9C-C125722F.0049F685@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:31:21 +0100
From:	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <HNGUYEN@...ibm.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linuxppc-dev-bounces+hnguyen=de.ibm.com@...abs.org,
	openib-general@...nib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address	to
 determine pending work requests

Hi Roland!
> OK.  After thinking about this, I'm going to queue it for 2.6.20 --
> we're _way_ too close to the 2.6.19 final release to put in patches
> that aren't either small and obvious, or fix a problem someone hit in
> real life.
That's fair. I understand your decision. And thanks for queueing for
2.6.20. Can you please brief me on patch procedures for post-2.6.19?
Regards
Nam

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/