[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1164311305.3013.25.camel@de-c-l-110.nero-de.internal>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:48:25 +0100
From: Mathieu Fluhr <mfluhr@...o.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 'False' IO error when copying from cdrom drive
Dear all,
I am currently facing a really weird thing. It seems that it is related
to the block driver (or whatever else related to block devices).
I explain: First take this really simple program:
----8<------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
if(argc < 2)
return 0;
int iFD = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
if(iFD == -1)
perror("open");
while(1)
sleep(1);
return 0;
}
----8<-----------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently, it just open a file in read only mode, and non-blocking.
If you use it for opening an IDE DVD recorder, it will just grab a file
descriptor, without checking if the media is present or not.
-> This is normally how the /dev/hdXX device file should be open to
use CDROM_SEND_PACKET ioctl.
(Note: Feel free to correct me if I am wrong)
Ok. Now take a full DVD (I tested DVD+R, +RW and -R), with more than
4 300 000 000 bytes (very important :), and perform the following:
0. Open the tray of your recorder
1. Launch this small program above, passing the recorder device file as
argument and let it run in background.
2. then put the disc in the device and mount it
3. try to copy to whole content on the hard drive
-> You will get an error like the following:
> kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
> kernel: hdb: rw=0, want=8388612, limit=8388604
If you do not launch this small program in background, everything works
like a charm.
What is really astonishing, is that no matter the media, no matter the
device, this 'limit' is ALWAYS 8388604. Which - as far as I debugged -
make exactly 4 294 965 248 bytes (that is where the 4 300 000 000 bytes
come from).
So am I think that there must be somehow a value corruption, as:
1. the limit shown in the kernel error log is wrong
2. whitout running this small prog, everything works fine.
Regards,
Mathieu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists