linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI MMConfig: Detect and support the E7520 and the 945G/GZ/P/PL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:44:38 +0100
From:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	"Hack inc." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI MMConfig: Detect and support the E7520 and the 945G/GZ/P/PL

On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 08:57:41PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 20:51 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > It seems that the only way to reliably support mmconfig in the
> > presence of funky biosen is to detect the hostbridge and read where
> > the window is mapped from its registers.  Do that for the E7520 and
> > the 945G/GZ/P/PL on x86-64 for a start.
> 
> 
> hi,
> 
> while I like this approach a lot, I am wondering if this shouldn't be
> done as a PCI quirk instead.... it would make a lot of sense to use that
> shared infrastructure for this...

I agree in principle, but aren't the quirks running way too late
compared to that?

  OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/