[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061123043543.GI3078@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:35:43 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: dgc@....com, jesper.juhl@...il.com, chatz@...bourne.sgi.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
xfs-masters@....sgi.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6 : Spontaneous reboots, stack overflows - seems to implicate xfs, scsi, networking, SMP
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:10:13PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:18:09 +1100
>
> > So, assuming the stacks less than 32 bytes are 32 bytes, we've got
> > 1380 bytes in the XFS stack there,
>
> On sparc64 just the XFS parts of the backtrace would be a minimum of
> 2816 bytes (each function has a minimum 8 * 16 byte stack frame, and
> there are about 22 calls in that trace). It's probably a lot more
> with local variables and such.
>
> It's way too much. You guys have to fix this stuff.
>
> If TCP's full send and receive path can be done in less function
> calls, XFS can allocate blocks in less too.
>
> I would even say 10 function calls deep to allocate file blocks
> is overkill, but 22 it just astronomically bad.
Especially since a large part is due to cxfs...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists