[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061123092433.1d2b9c95@frecb000686>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:24:33 +0100
From: Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio <linux-aio@...ck.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Jean Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4][AIO] - AIO completion signal notification
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:22:15 -0800
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com> wrote:
> > OK, looking at this, there's something bothering me: io_submit_one() needs
> > a pointer to the user iocb in order to push back the iocb->ki_key to userspace,
> > as well as storing the user_iocb pointer into iocb->ki_obj.
>
> Why can't it continue to do what it does today? Both of those uses of
> the user_iocb pointer involve fixed-width fields and don't need compat help.
Aah, right, thanks.
>
> > So I think that some of the logic in io_submit_one() must be moved up to
> > sys_io_submit(), including the aio_get_req() call.
>
> I don't see why that would be needed.
Not anymore, indeed.
Thanks,
Sébastien.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists