linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:04:25 -0800
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)

On Tuesday 21 November 2006 1:24 pm, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> Subject    : ACPI: AE_TIME errors
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/15/12
> Submitter  : David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
> Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>              Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>
> Status     : problem is being debugged

I've not seen this in over 3 days now, and am willing to believe that
the previous instance (after manually reverting the patch identified
by Linus) was a fluke ... it's certainly not the critical/blocking kind
of issue it had previously been.

- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/