[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830611230131w1bf63dc1m1998b55b61579509@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:31:47 -0800
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Pavel Emelianov" <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: "Kirill Korotaev" <dev@...ru>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
matthltc@...ibm.com, hch@...radead.org,
"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, oleg@...sign.ru,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/13] BC: context handling
On 11/23/06, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
> You mean moving is like this:
>
> old_bc = task->real_bc;
> task->real_bc = new_bc;
> cmpxchg(&tsk->exec_bc, old_bc, new_bc);
>
> ? Then this won't work:
>
> Initialisation:
> current->exec_bc = init_bc;
> current->real_bc = init_bc;
> ...
> IRQ:
> current->exec_bc = init_bc;
> ...
> old_bc = tsk->real_bc; /* init_bc */
> tsk->real_bc = bc1;
> cx(tsk->exec_bc, init_bc, bc1); /* ok */
> ...
> Here at the middle of an interrupt
> we have bc1 set as exec_bc on task
> which IS wrong!
You could get round that by having a separate "irq_bc" that's never
valid for a task not in an interrupt.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists