[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45674453.9040108@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:13:23 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Yan Burman <burman.yan@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org,
wli@...omorphy.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc6] sparc: replace kmalloc+memset with kzalloc
Yan Burman wrote:
> Stefan Richter wrote:
>> ...in this ^, the old code and your update don't check for NULL return.
>
> Both of this parts are done at early stages, so it is probably:
> a) Impossible to recover from failure
> b) If you run out of memory at this stage, you are probably in very big
> trouble anyway
>
> I could modify it to check and panic if the check fails.
> Would that be better?
I hope the domain experts answer this. (I have no recommendation but
wanted to point out a potential, although unlikely, cause for trouble.)
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- =-== ==---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists