lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:14:12 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
	Johann Borck <johann.borck@...sedata.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [take25 1/6] kevent: Description.

On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:48:32 +0100
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:

> > The alternative is the sorry state we have now.  In nscd, for instance, 
> > we have one single thread waiting for incoming connections and it then 
> > has to wake up a worker thread to handle the processing.  This is done 
> > because we cannot "park" all threads in the accept() call since when a 
> > new connection is announced _all_ the threads are woken.  With the new 
> > event handling this wouldn't be the case, one thread only is woken and 
> > we don't have to wake worker threads.  All threads can be worker threads.
> 
> Having one specialized thread handling the distribution of work to worker 
> threads is better most of the time.

It might be now.  Think "commodity 128-way".  Your single distribution thread
will run out of steam.

What Ulrich is proposing is faster.  This is a new interface.  Let's design
it to be fast.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ