linux-kernel - Re: SATA Performance with Intel ICH6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061125112321.1767a53c.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:23:21 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	"Martin A. Fink" <fink@....mpg.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA Performance with Intel ICH6

On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:10:11 +0100
"Martin A. Fink" <fink@....mpg.de> wrote:

> Here some measurement results:
> 
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=test.zero bs=1M count=1000
> results in
> 
> real 0m52.561s
> user 0m0.003s
> sys  0m7.407s
> 
> and strace dd... gives among other information
> 6.84s 1004calls syscall: write
> 
> So I spend 45s of 52s within the kernel. Why so long?

Profiling the kernel will tell.  Preferably with oprofile, but if for some
reason that doesn't work, with the old profiler.

I use this:

#!/bin/sh
sudo opcontrol --stop
sudo opcontrol --shutdown
sudo rm -rf /var/lib/oprofile
sudo opcontrol --vmlinux=/boot/vmlinux-$(uname -r)
sudo opcontrol --start-daemon
sudo opcontrol --start
time $@
sudo opcontrol --stop
sudo opcontrol --shutdown
sudo opreport -l /boot/vmlinux-$(uname -r) | head -50

I have seen PIO and MMIO operations on PCI busses take tremendous amounts
of time when that bus is saturated with DMA transfers.  But that was back
in the old days.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/