linux-kernel - Re: Overriding X on panic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061126142213.52c292d3@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:22:13 +0000
From:	Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Casey Dahlin <cjdahlin@...u.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Overriding X on panic

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:18:41 +0100
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> > The mode switch sequences for modern cards are a bit more hairy than
> > lists of I/O poking unfortunately. 
> 
> for the Intel hw Keith doesn't seem to think it's all that much of a
> problem though...

Including the TV out, odder LCD panels, non BIOS modes etc ? If so then
it might be an interesting test case for intelfb to grow some kind of
console helper interface

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/