[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1164564469.9291.17.camel@localhost>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:07:49 +0100
From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64| perhaps
duplicate bug report?
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:29:02 +0100
> Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk> wrote:
>
> > it appears some sort of bug has gotten into .19, in regards to x86
> > emulation on x86_64.
> >
> > i have only tested with >=rc5, thw folling, as an example, appears in
> > dmesg:
> > ioctl32(regedit.exe:11801): Unknown cmd fd(9) cmd(82187201){02}
> > arg(00221000) on /home/redeeman
> > ioctl32(regedit.exe:11801): Unknown cmd fd(9) cmd(82187201){02}
> > arg(00221000) on /home/redeeman/.wine/drive_c/windows/system32
>
> Try
>
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/compat-log
>
> I don't _think_ we did anything to change the logging in there. Which kernel
> version were you using previously (the one which didn't do this)?
>
it just struck me, that this may be the same bug Jesper Juhl has
discovered (atleast the hardlock part), as i read that thread, it strike
me that whenever i have hardlocks from this, its when i in wine runs
stuff that uses basically all my ram, and MAY even touch my swap.
just an idea.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists