[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061126235317.5d40d22c@inspiron>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:53:17 +0100
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: "Joakim Tjernlund" <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
Cc: "'David Brownell'" <david-b@...bell.net>,
"'Benjamin Herrenschmidt'" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<akpm@...l.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<ralf@...ux-mips.org>, "'Andi Kleen'" <ak@....de>,
<paulus@...ba.org>, <rmk@....linux.org.uk>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kkojima@...iij4u.or.jp>
Subject: Re: NTP time sync
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 22:37:10 +0100
"Joakim Tjernlund" <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se> wrote:
> > the concept of static numbers is quite old...
>
> Yes it is old, but is the old way unsupported now? I have an embedded target
> which is using the old static /dev directory, do I need to make
> it udev aware to use newer features like the rtc subsystem?
That can be a good option. You can also do
a symlink to /dev/rtc0 in your boot scripts or simply
upgrade your hwclock to a version that accepts
the device as a parameter.
The old /dev/rtc name is not supported on the new rtc subsystem.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists