linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Make the NUMA hash function nodemap allocation dynamic and remove NODEMAPSIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200611271638.54559.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:38:54 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Amul Shah <amul.shah@...sys.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Make the NUMA hash function nodemap allocation dynamic and remove NODEMAPSIZE


> I believe that this problem is related to a new patch that enhances the
> fake NUMA code (see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/469457).

I haven't got these patches applied, so that's unlikely.

BTW if you resubmit make sure to keep the #ifdefs I added -- your original
version didn't compile without CONFIG_NUMA

Does it work for you when you boot the kernel on a non NUMA system 
(like a normal small Intel platform)? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/