[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0611271155q55adf6fftd489de84d6ae7e88@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:55:58 -0600
From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@...il.com>
To: "bert hubert" <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
ming@...s.ufl.edu, "Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] dm-cache: block level disk cache target for device mapper
On 11/27/06, bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:26:34PM +0000, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> > This is the first cut of a device-mapper target which provides a write-back
> > or write-through block cache. It is intended to be used in conjunction with
> > remote block devices such as iSCSI or ATA-over-Ethernet, particularly in
> > cluster situations.
>
> How does this work in practice? In other words, what is a typical actual
> configuration?
>
> There is a remote block device, and a local one, and these are kept into
> sync in some way?
>
That's the basic idea. In our testbed, we had a single iSCSI server
exporting block devices to several clients -- each maintaining their
own local disk cache of the server exported block devices. You can
configured either write-through or write-back policies -- write-back
has better performance, but somewhat obvious consistency issues in
failure cases.
The original intent was to combine this with the dm-cow target (which
I posted a few hours before the dm-cache patch) to provide a scalable
cluster deployment system based on back-end iSCSI or ATA-over-Ethernet
storage.
-eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists