[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061127122052.GA14752@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:20:52 +0100
From: Stefan Seyfried <seife@...e.de>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:11:33AM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> options seem to work, and vbetool appears to helpfully segfault on any operation so that's out.
Try this one:
From: Matthew Garrett
Subject: Fix failures on AMD64
This patch fixes at least some of the cases where vbetool segfaulted on x86_64
while the x86 emulator was executing BIOS code.
--- x86-common.c
+++ x86-common.c
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
#include "include/lrmi.h"
-#define REAL_MEM_BASE ((void *)0x10000)
-#define REAL_MEM_SIZE 0x90000
+#define REAL_MEM_BASE ((void *)0x1000)
+#define REAL_MEM_SIZE 0xa0000
#define REAL_MEM_BLOCKS 0x100
struct mem_block {
I have this in our vbetool-0.7 packages and have no reports about
segfaults since then.
--
Stefan Seyfried
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists