[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061128200927.GA26934@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:09:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6-rt8: alsa xruns
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch and getting alsa xruns when
> using jackd and jack clients. This is a sample from the output of
> qjackctl / jackd (jack 0.102.25, qjackctl 0.2.21):
> ( japa-4096 |#0): new 17 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> ( beagled-3412 |#1): new 19 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> ( IRQ 18-1081 |#1): new 26 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> ( snd-4040 |#1): new 1107 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> ( japa-4096 |#0): new 1445 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> ( japa-4096 |#0): new 2110 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> ( qjackctl-4038 |#1): new 2328 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> ( japa-4096 |#0): new 2548 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> ( IRQ 18-1081 |#0): new 10291 us maximum-latency wakeup.
hm, lets fix this. Could you enable tracing (on the yum rpm) via:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_enabled
does /proc/latency_trace have any meaningful events included for such a
long delay? If not then it would be nice to rebuild the kernel with
CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACING - and in any case my previous suggestion holds
too: booting with maxcpus=1 to reproduce the latencies will give easier
to interpret latency traces. (but if it's SMP-only then no problem, the
latency traces are still valuable)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists