linux-kernel - Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [2.6 patch] remove DVB_AV7110

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0611281304180.5546@shell3.speakeasy.net>
Date:	Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:06:02 -0800 (PST)
From:	Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
cc:	v4l-dvb-maintainer@...uxtv.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [2.6 patch] remove DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE was (except for some OSS drivers) the only option
> that was still compiling a binary-only user-supplied firmware file at
> build-time into the kernel.
>
> This patch changes the driver to always use the standard
> request_firmware() way for firmware by removing DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE.

Doesn't this also prevent the AV7110 module from getting compiled
into the kernel?  Shouldn't the Kconfig file be adjusted so
that 'y' can't be selected anymore and it depends on MODULES?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/