[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061129085705.52839.qmail@web57906.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:57:05 -0800 (PST)
From: tike64 <tike64@...oo.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: realtime-preempt and arm
Hi all,
I'm trying the realtime-preempt patch-2.6.18-rt6 on
lh7a400 arm system with little success. In a test
program I try 5 ms timeout with select() but get 20 ms
avg or 26 ms max. When the framebuffer scrolls, the
max delay goes up to 59 ms. With a vanilla kernel I
get 10 ms (because of tick resolution?), 11 ms and 39
ms.
My question is, is the realtime-preempt patch supposed
to work on arm architecture and/or without high
resolution timer (which lh7a40x seems to lack) at all
or should I just try to be more clever.
Relevant code:
====
prio.sched_priority = 99;
if (sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_RR, &prio) < 0) ...
if (mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) < 0) ...
while (1) {
t = raw_timer();
tv.tv_usec = 5000;
tv.tv_sec = 0;
select(0, 0, 0, 0, &tv);
t = raw_timer() - t;
if (max_t < t) max_t = t;
if (min_t > t) min_t = t;
avg_t += t;
++n;
if (n < 100) continue;
printf("%i revs; min: %i max: %i avg: %i\n",
n,
min_t,
max_t,
(avg_t + n / 2) / n);
====
Relevant config: PREEMPT_RT, PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS,
PREEMPT_HARDIRQS
I didnt' enable HIGH_RES_TIMERS because lh7a40x seems
not to support it.
--
tike
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists