[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061129092023.GA23101@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:20:24 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot failure with ext2 and initrds
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:30:36AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:40:00 +0000
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > Yet another attempt to get a response from Andrew. It is rather
> > important that you DO respond to this.
>
> You can read the code as easily as I can?
Sigh. Please don't cut the relevant part of my _first_ email message
where it can be clearly seen that I _have_ read the code and interpreted
it _differently_ from you.
> I'm not really sure what you're asking - I thought Mingming cleared
> things up.
Which message did this happen?
What I'm looking for is confirmation of the semantics of
find_next_zero_bit(), which is a fairly simple question to ask, and
certainly does not justify this rather obtuse and difficult thread.
<extremely frustrated>
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists