linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c should #include "scsi_transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:13:35 -0500
From:	James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, James.Bottomley@...elEye.com,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c should #include "scsi_transport_api.h"



Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> +#include "scsi_transport_api.h"
> 
> scsi_transport_api.h is a weird little file.  It's not included by
> anything in the drivers/scsi directory, only
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c:#include "../scsi_transport_api.h"
> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c:#include "../scsi/scsi_transport_api.h"
> 
> To me, that says it should be living in include/scsi/ somewhere ...
> maybe just put the one function prototype into scsi_eh.h?

would it only go in include/scsi if it intends to be an exported
api for LLDD's and/or user apps ?  and stay in drivers/scsi if its
an internal api within the scsi subsystem itself ?

Based on who uses it, I would say its internal right now.

-- james s
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/