linux-kernel - Re: fs/9p/vfs_inode.c(406): remark #593: variable "sb" was set but never used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6fcc0a0611290648kcef7dacs670eef2588d00788@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:48:14 +0300
From:	"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	"d binderman" <dcb314@...mail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fs/9p/vfs_inode.c(406): remark #593: variable "sb" was set but never used

On 11/29/06, d binderman <dcb314@...mail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> I just tried to compile Linux kernel 2.6.18.3 with the Intel C
> C compiler.
>
> The compiler said
>
> 1.
>
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c(406): remark #593: variable "sb" was set but never used
>
> The source code is
>
>     struct super_block *sb = NULL;
>
> I have checked the source code and I agree with the compiler.
> Suggest delete local variable.
>
> 2.
>
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c(757): remark #593: variable "olddirfidnum" was set but
> never used
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c(758): remark #593: variable "newdirfidnum" was set but
> never used

Please, upload full list of these warnings somewhere and post URL.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/