[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061129130944.82e3d9bb.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:09:44 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 add idle notifier
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:09:39 +0000
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:25:40AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is a patch that adds an idle notifier to the i386 tree.
> > The idle notifier functionalities and implementation are
> > identical to the x86_64 idle notifier. We use the idle notifier
> > in the context of perfmon.
> >
> > The patch is against Andi Kleen's x86_64-2.6.19-rc6-061128-1.bz2
> > kernel. It may apply to other kernels but it needs some updates
> > to poll_idle() and default_idle() to work correctly.
>
> Walking through a notifier chain on every single interrupt (including
> timer interrupts) seems rather costly. What do you need this for
> exactly?
yes, it's a worry.
Why doesn't enter_idle() do the test_and_set_bit() thing, like
exit_idle()?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists