lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3slg3ktvw.fsf@defiant.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:56:35 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist 
	<netfilter-devel@...ts.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function

Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> writes:

> It might be the case that your network device has a
> hard_header_len > LL_MAX_HEADER, which could trigger
> a corruption.

Hmm... GRE tunnels add 24 bytes... I just noticed the following code in
include/linux/netdevice.h:

/*
 *      Compute the worst case header length according to the protocols
 *      used.
 */
 
#if !defined(CONFIG_AX25) && !defined(CONFIG_AX25_MODULE) && !defined(CONFIG_TR)
#define LL_MAX_HEADER   32
#else
#if defined(CONFIG_AX25) || defined(CONFIG_AX25_MODULE)
#define LL_MAX_HEADER   96
#else
#define LL_MAX_HEADER   48
#endif
#endif

#if !defined(CONFIG_NET_IPIP) && \
    !defined(CONFIG_IPV6) && !defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
#define MAX_HEADER LL_MAX_HEADER
#else
#define MAX_HEADER (LL_MAX_HEADER + 48)
#endif

I don't use AX25, Token Ring, the old IPIP tunnels nor IPv6 here, but
I wonder if GRE tunnel (which is basically another, more compatible
form of IPIP) need the same treatment as IPIP.

I've confirmed that REJECTs over GRE tunnel caused that corruption.

> Please try this patch on top of the REJECT patch (ideally after
> verifying that the REJECT patch is really introducing the
> corruption).

That was certain. The patch fixed the problem, confirmed with current
git tree as well. Thanks for looking at it.


I'm not sure about LL_MAX_HEADER (and/or MAX_HEADER) though. Should it
be changed as well?

There are many devices adding data to header space, perhaps tacking
devices doesn't count as the skb is being linearized in
dev->hard_start_xmit() or equivalent path?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ